published by: surveillanceguide
Who does not want to be Big Brother? To be the all-seeing, powerful god of all? Well, possibly not “controlling god of all” but being the all-seeing person will be just as commanding, don’t you think? That can be one basis why there are many concerns when it comes to utilizing hidden spy cameras, invasion of privacy being one of them. Power is basically something that everyone abhors and, ironically, anyone likes. Spy cameras, while they’re a benefit to a specific individual, can be so destructive to the other. They could be a vital tool or something that would pull you down.
There is this one case involving a professor who utilized a hidden camera cloaked as a button to film naughty students in school. The students together with their families have filed cases against the mentioned teacher for “abusing her authority” as well as filming the students without their permission. Yes, it was unlawful for the professor to do it, but if we evaluate the other direction, we might notice that what the teacher was actually doing was exposing these behavioral issues to the public so that they can be addressed appropriately. I am relatively sure that the Virginia Tech accident is still fresh on everyone’s minds. Such behavioral propensities could have been noticed earlier and consequently avoided the incident from happening. If a concealed spy cam is what it entails to stop such tragic occurrences, then I would not mind teachers recording their students at school in any way.
Yet there are also some who abuse the benefits of hidden video cameras. I would assume all are aware of concerns of shocking behavior caught on video that are being used to blackmail an individual. Or those that blatantly invades someone’s privacy as in putting concealed cameras in areas wherein surveillance is not necessary, like the bathroom or personal rooms for purposes of personal gratification or lascivious intent. Stalking utilizing spy video cameras is also another form of misuse of this technology.
But there’s one thing that shocks me. A couple of homeowners use nanny cameras to check their baby-sitters and house helpers while they’re away. And these nannies are not attentive of the existence of the spy cam till they get caught performing some monkey business and dealt with about it. Yet no one appears to be protesting. If they get caught mistreating a child or doing something wrong, the matter of the nanny’s right to privacy is not raised. It’s because the owners have the authority to do whatever they like to secure the family and the nanny did something wrong.
Hence, when is the use of concealed surveillance cameras defensible and when is it not? Apparently, the thin red demarcation dividing them is much thinner than we thought. When the person using the surveillance camera is in authority, its use is justified. However, if choosing to use hidden spy cameras will make us more secured, then I am for it. Besides, why would I be concerned about it when I am not doing anything that is against the law or is morally incorrect? But as long as they maintain well behind the line, it wouldn’t be an issue.
Toying with the idea of getting a wireless security camera or other hidden video cameras? Discover the power of wireless video surveillance when you visit video-surveillance-guide.com now!
You like what oocuz.com does? Give a tip here.
Any amount is very welcome:
Help oocuz grow-every amount is great.



































